Intentional Systems Theory, Mental Causation and Empathie Resonance
نویسنده
چکیده
In the first section of this paper I argue that the main reason why Daniel Dennett's Intentional Systems Theory (1ST) has been perceived as behaviourist or antirealist is its inability to account for the causal efficacy of the mental. The rest of the paper is devoted to the claim that by emending the theory with a phenomenon called 'empathie resonance' (ER), it can account for the various explananda in the mental causation debate. Thus, 1ST + ER is a much more viable option than 1ST, even though IST + ER assigns a crucial role to the phenomenology of agency, a role that is incompatible with Dennett's writings on consciousness. The most fundamental thesis of Daniel Dennett's intentional systems theory (1ST; Dennett 1978, 1987) is that the ontology of mental states cannot be considered in abstraction from the epistemology of mental state ascription. From this thesis, a number of attractive features follow. 1ST respects the distinction between the sub personal and the personal level of description (the distinction is Dennett's (1969) own). It resists the reification of beliefs and desires like no other theory that aspires to a form of realism about the mental. It does not imply theses about the nature of the brain that may or do contradict the findings of neuroscience, nor does it need to postulate theses about the brain that are immune to empirical investigation. But 1ST has never been an overly popular position. This is due mainly to its perceived behaviourist, instrumentalist character?its failure to secure mental realism, despite its aspirations. One way to understand this opposition against 1ST, as I shall explain in the next section, is to construe it as a worry about the inability of 1ST to accommodate the phenomenon of mental causation. Indeed, Dennett does not even attempt to make room for mental causation within 1ST. M. V. P. Slors (El) Department of Philosophy, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9103, Nijmegen 6500 HD, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Intentionality: Transparent, Translucent, and Opaque
Exploring intentionality from an externalist perspective, I distinguish three kinds of intentionality in the case of seeing, which I call transparent, translucent, and opaque respectively. I then extend the distinction from seeing to knowing, and then to believing. Having explicated the three-fold distinction, I then critically explore some important consequences that follow from granting that ...
متن کاملAttribution of Intentional Causation Influences the Perception of Observed Movements: Behavioral Evidence and Neural Correlates
Recent research on human agency suggests that intentional causation is associated with a subjective compression in the temporal interval between actions and their effects. That is, intentional movements and their causal effects are perceived as closer together in time than equivalent unintentional movements and their causal effects. This so-called intentional binding effect is consistently foun...
متن کاملIntentional Systems Theory
Intentional systems theory is in the first place an analysis of the meanings of such everyday 'mentalistic' terms as 'believe,' 'desire,' 'expect,' 'decide,' and 'intend,' the terms of 'folk psychology' (Dennett 1971) that we use to interpret, explain, and predict the behavior of other human beings, animals, some artifacts such as robots and computers, and indeed ourselves. In traditional parla...
متن کاملrecis of The Intentional Stance
The intentional stance is the strategy of prediction and explanation that attributes beliefs, desires, and other "intentional" states to systems living and nonliving and predicts future behavior from what it would be rational for an agent to do, given those beliefs and desires. Any system whose performance can be thus predicted and explained is an intentional system, whatever its innards . The ...
متن کاملThe "eggshell plaintiff" revisited: causation of mental damages in civil litigation.
The legal concept of the " eggshell plaintiff, " when explaining the causation of a plaintiff's claimed psychological injury, may be an archaic and a misleading paradigm. The " thin skull " or " eggshell plaintiff " rule—often described as the " defendant takes the victim as found " —protects the rights of individuals whose preexisting fragility makes them particularly susceptible to injury. Th...
متن کامل